| | |
|
Wow........BGM does it again. I am so sorry Melissa that you even
had to listen to "his" crap. I would not believe ONE word he
said, and I would be on the phone with my OB asap. I think
it's all BS.....just another excuse for them to not admit they ARE
wrong sometimes. :(
What I don't get it WHY is this product still on the market? Who
is it going...
27 Oct 2005 1:04 PM
|
|
|
Oh boy, what will be next? I find it very strange that they would
just openly make an offer like that to a total stranger who emailed
them some questions. Seems very fishy.
22 Oct 2005 2:38 PM
|
|
|
Girl, I feel the SAME way! My test is also right(so far, I
haven't had the baby yet) but I still did so much unnecessary worring
about the test being wrong. With all the wrong results coming
through here, I just kept think mine was wrong too.
Congrats on your girl!!
19 Oct 2005 2:43 PM
|
|
|
I posted on the results thread, but you didn't include mine?
BGM: Girl .U/S: Girl
18 Oct 2005 12:20 AM
|
|
|
Unless my doctor requested I get one, I would never consider it.
13 Oct 2005 4:03 PM
|
|
|
Date you did BGM: July of 2005
Weeks of pg (gestation) on this date: I was 9 weeks exactly
Baby's due date: 3/2/2006(Dr. said at last U/S baby is measuring ahead which would bring my date to 2/27/2006)
BGM Result: GIRL
U/S Result: U/S at 16 weeks showed nothing between the legs, but didn't
show girl parts either. U/S at 19 weeks, baby was uncoopertive.
Baby's gender at birth: N...
06 Oct 2005 4:20 PM
|
|
|
But baby did not un-cross "her" legs once. Darn!! I did have an
un-expected U/S about two weeks ago, and the dotcor did say then he
didn't see anything between the legs, but couldn't be 100% sure
either. ARG!! SO I am assuming BGM is right, but I guess I
won't know 100% until I give birth. Baby is HEALTHY and
that's all that matters. :)
I did talk to my OB abo...
04 Oct 2005 4:14 PM
|
|
|
WOW WOW WOW!!! It is starting to seem more true everyday that it
is a complete SCAM!! I am so sorry you even have to go through
this!!! All of us here are dealing with these crazy emotions
too. I am just SO MAD that they are getting by with it, it should
be illigal!!!
PLEASE keep us updated. I hope you can bring BGM DOWN. We don't deserve to be tak...
23 Sep 2005 12:38 AM
|
|
|
Well I know with boys in the house you have to be very carful! I
did my test when DH was at work & my DS was at grandma's. lol
I also scrubed my hands & arms before.
I really am not sure, but from what I am reading on the net BGM
is only correct 66% of the time. Which is beyond frustrating
for me. Also BGM is wrong more often when they say it's a
boy....
19 Sep 2005 12:40 AM
|
|
|
Hi!! I have a son & a daughter. After I had my son I
really wanted a girl. I read up on all the different ways I could
change the enviorment ect. Well I ended up with secondary
infertility, so I ended up just TTC with no intention on trying for a
certain sex. It took a year and a half to get my DD......on a
break cycle too.(I was just about to start injectabl...
16 Sep 2005 12:51 PM
|
|
|
First I want to say thanks for having this board to vent on.
Well the more I read the more I have doubts. It really does play
with emotions. Yes I really want my results to be ture. I
want my little girl to have a sister, and ever since Acu-Gen told me
it's a girl I have been dreaming away! I never had a sister, and
I was just looking forward so much for my da...
16 Sep 2005 12:26 PM
|
|
That is a GIRL baby in you. I would bet all my money on that. They better give you 200% money back too when that baby is born!
Just only makes me wonder more about BGM...:( I was told I am having a girl, so now I am wondering how true they are. My U/S is Oct. 4th, so I will know then I guess.
13 Sep 2005 6:17 PM
|
|
|
Everything I have been reading on the net....message boards &
articles, I still get some people/doctors that swear it 99.9% accurate.
Then I read these message boards with women having their U/S's, and
finding out BGM was wrong? SO WHO IS RIGHT????
I did do the test back in July, and now I don't know what to
believe. I was told I am having a girl, but honestly after r...
11 Sep 2005 8:54 PM
|