| | |
|
I'm not seeing the pic either.
02 Sep 2010 3:48 PM
|
|
|
That's actually a nice girl shot, maybe even better than a toilet shot at this stage. [dd] I think your tech got it right.
02 Sep 2010 3:47 PM
|
|
|
Congrats!!! [ds]
02 Sep 2010 2:42 PM
|
|
|
[quote user="nicholerh"]I'm sorry, your boy shot looks like a clitoris
I looked back on your previous pics and your boy pics look all girl to me
[/quote]
I agree. I'm really sorry that happened. I can't believe they all told you boy based on those shots, especially considering that it wasn't the first time there had been a mistake. I would be very upset, too.
02 Sep 2010 2:41 PM
|
|
|
Thinking blue! [ds]
02 Sep 2010 2:37 PM
|
|
|
At 13w4d, that looks very girly! [dd]
02 Sep 2010 2:32 PM
|
|
|
Sorry, but I'm having a hard time making out the image, and I don't want to comment unless I can see it clearly. If you're able to get a better picture to scan, bump this up and I'll try to take another look.
02 Sep 2010 2:31 PM
|
|
|
I see boy bits, too. [ds]
02 Sep 2010 2:27 AM
|
|
|
TBH, I'm not sure either. I don't see anything defined in any of the pictures. I would love to see video, if you have it.
02 Sep 2010 2:25 AM
|
|
|
[quote user="Sunrise"]
What are his reasons for inducing? He needs to have a better one than he just "doesn't like" going past 39 weeks.
[/quote]
I totally agree. This isn't good practice, and I'd be running far away from a doctor who told me that unless I had no other option, or there was a sound medical reason for the induction.
I've had two births with Pitocin throughout a...
31 Aug 2010 7:06 PM
|
|
|
Not the clearest shots I've ever seen, and 15 weeks can be a tricky age - but I'd be ready to hear boy later on. [ds]
31 Aug 2010 2:17 PM
|
|
|
Looking at the orientation of the lines, I'm not so sure that's not cord showing up. Is there any way you can post a link to the video?
31 Aug 2010 2:09 PM
|
|
|
I agree, sorry.
31 Aug 2010 2:08 PM
|
|
|
I wouldn't buy blue off this shot, but I expect you'll be hearing boy in a few weeks.
I got a similar shot at 14w2d, but the baby was measuring about 5 days behind. He's still a boy, almost two years later. [;)] Let me know if you want me to post the pic.
31 Aug 2010 2:07 PM
|
|
|
Weak girl guess from the first shot. [dd] It's the only one that's close to being clear.
31 Aug 2010 2:02 PM
|
|
|
My thoughts exactly. [ds] The penis is imaging with three lines, which happens sometimes, and I see a scrotum behind it.
31 Aug 2010 2:00 PM
|
|
|
The nub does look flat in the best shot, but I'm 50-50 on pics in the 11th week. People get burned on those all the time - it's just too early. [:(]
31 Aug 2010 1:58 PM
|
|
|
I agree, nice girl shot! [dd]
31 Aug 2010 1:56 PM
|
|
|
I'd be thinking blue from those. [ds] I found out at almost the same GA that #3 was a boy, and your pics look very similar.
31 Aug 2010 1:55 PM
|
|
|
50-50 for me, sorry.
31 Aug 2010 1:53 PM
|
|
|
All boy! [ds]
31 Aug 2010 1:52 PM
|
|
|
Slight pink lean from the last shot in the new set.
31 Aug 2010 1:51 PM
|
|
|
The nub looks flat in the second shot, but I can't be sure that's not due to the baby's position. I really don't know, sorry! I think it could go either way.
31 Aug 2010 1:50 PM
|
|
|
It may be a boy, but TBH I don't like either of those pics much. The angles are really odd. It looks like the first one was taken from a bit behind the baby (best way I can describe it), which is not where you'd want to be to look for a penis and scrotum. The parts aren't well-defined to me either. The second isn't showing anything clearly either, just a rather ambiguous-lookin...
28 Aug 2010 2:52 PM
|
|
|
What I saw looked more like swollen girl parts (normal in the 16th week) than a penis. Toward the end of the video, I saw what appeared to be enlarged labia with a clitoris in between, denoted by a "Y' shape in the middle of the mound between the legs. This is usually a pretty reliable indicator of a girl.
But ... there were a few quick shots toward the middle of the video that appeared to show ...
25 Aug 2010 9:10 PM
|