Girl!!! But I don't really understand this ultrasound pic. My tech seemed very confident, so I believe her, any input?
march 02 aug 04 nov 06 april 10 due 16th oct x
That's the only picture I have, baby was in a weird position so that may be why you can't see the full legs around what she points to as the "girl" parts.
Is there more than one baby in there? Because I see what the arrow is pointing to, but more importantly, I also see this:
2003 2006 2009
Three times lucky ... and we're done.
And you're definitely not having twins? It's not just the two different sets of parts, it really looks like two babies. There's an entire leg there (not to mention the scrotum and penis) that isn't connected to the "girl" baby. Was this scan done in a doctor's office?
I was thinking exactly what Coldwater said but was afraid to say it in case I was wrong. But that REALLY looks like a boy to me..... Not sure what the arrow is pointing to as far as saying "girl" parts. Confused.
My babies-Evan (5) Eli (3) Lily (1) Lucy 5/30/12
Well, all I can say is go for a re-scan, preferably with a certified sonographer. I see a leg and boy parts that I have no other way to account for. Very odd.
Wow i havent seen that before, the arrows are definatly pointing to girly parts. Hope you get some answers.
20/11/09 Lilah Nicole 10/08/11 Joel Thomas
Very proud Mummy and Daddy
Our "little" family is complete! ..... Maybe.
I love my boys!
My first thought was BOY!!! I think the arrow is pointing to the wrong place??? Weird. I would def. go for another scan!
2001 - My Drama King 2009 - My Little Einstein & 2013 - My Sweet New Baby
Sorry for all the questions, but . . . was this an entertainment u/s studio? How do you know for sure you're not having twins? Do you have any other pics at all?