<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Extreme Gender Swaying</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/93.aspx</link><description>At-home self-insemination: TBM Method and Spliming. (Formerly "At-Home High Tech".)</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Debug Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Re: MSU Question TTC boy</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248798.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 04:19:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:2248798</guid><dc:creator>wasabi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248798.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=93&amp;PostID=2248798</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Just found the answer in another area and will share.....&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;
&lt;div class="pfmsgtext" style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;tab-stops:list 0cm;"&gt;&lt;font color="#000000"&gt;Should you use the thinnest part of the EW or the thickest?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;font face="Times New Roman"&gt;&lt;font size="3"&gt;
&lt;p class="pfmsgtext" style="MARGIN:0cm 0cm 0pt;tab-stops:list 0cm;"&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE:10pt;"&gt;&lt;font color="#339966" size="3"&gt;It depends on your dh&amp;#39;s semen.&amp;nbsp; For some thick EW float, and thin sink, but for others thin EW floats and thick sinks.&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Lots of practice is what is necessary!!&lt;span style="mso-spacerun:yes;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;Start with the thick and then try the thin.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/font&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: MSU Question TTC boy</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248792.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 03:41:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:2248792</guid><dc:creator>wasabi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248792.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=93&amp;PostID=2248792</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok...I&amp;#39;ve got the mesh...some fine netting. Should I use the thick part of the EW or the runny bit???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: MSU Question TTC boy</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248169.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:36:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:2248169</guid><dc:creator>wasabi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248169.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=93&amp;PostID=2248169</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sorry....also should the sugar water be warmed to room temp too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: MSU Question TTC boy</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248131.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:29:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:2248131</guid><dc:creator>wasabi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248131.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=93&amp;PostID=2248131</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks, Tamara. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We tried again last night with SW, but the sperm still didn&amp;#39;t float??? The sperm was still alive but it had mixed as we colored the EW this time also.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;If we use mesh, what mesh is recommended?? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: MSU Question TTC boy</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248120.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:16:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:2248120</guid><dc:creator>Tamara</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2248120.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=93&amp;PostID=2248120</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just wondering....would it be better to put EW on top of the final sample in the Instead cup as well as putting some on your cervix???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;you can do that, but its not needed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Also, we seem to have trouble with our EW sinking. We are now using smaller test tubes 11.5 X 76mm, with better results. I find that it is perfectly separated before we put it in the incubator, but once we pull it out, the sample is slightly mixed with cylcone patterns. When I look at it under the microscope, I can still see the Super X&amp;#39;s in the first layer and the straight swimmers in the secondish layer, but the layer between the sperm and the EW is not clearly defined. Should I try using mesh with a bigger test tube???&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bigger test tube your ew may sink. dont use the layer before it touches the seperm, only use ew&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, does anyone know if there any better photos of a successful sort other than the ones in the experiment photos??? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;there is a thread with a bunch of pics &lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>MSU Question TTC boy</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2247133.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:15:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:2247133</guid><dc:creator>wasabi</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/thread/2247133.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=93&amp;PostID=2247133</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi, &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just wondering....would it be better to put EW on top of the final sample in the Instead cup as well as putting some on your cervix???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Also, we seem to have trouble with our EW sinking. We are now using smaller test tubes 11.5 X 76mm, with better results. I find that it is perfectly separated before we put it in the incubator, but once we pull it out, the sample is slightly mixed with cylcone patterns. When I look at it under the microscope, I can still see the Super X&amp;#39;s in the first layer and the straight swimmers in the secondish layer, but the layer between the sperm and the EW is not clearly defined. Should I try using mesh with a bigger test tube???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, does anyone know if there any better photos of a successful sort other than the ones in the experiment photos??? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Would appreciate any advice... &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Thanks &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>