<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>NPR Radio investigates Baby Gender Mentor accuracy claims</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/09/29/NPR-Baby-Gender-Mentor.aspx</link><description>NPR's "Morning Edition" today features an extensive discussion about Baby Gender Mentor's accuracy claims. Two mothers who have posted here about their results are interviewed: Danielle, a mother who was told by Acu-Gen to expect her third boy but who</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Debug Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Baby Gender Mentor named a &amp;amp;quot;best product of the year&amp;amp;quot; by DataMonitor, obviously a very on-the-ball company</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/09/29/NPR-Baby-Gender-Mentor.aspx#6647</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:29:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:6647</guid><dc:creator>Gender Selection News</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;No, you're not accidently reading &amp;amp;quot;The Onion&amp;amp;quot; by mistake, this really happened.&lt;br&gt;Baby Gender Mentor...&lt;img src="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6647" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Baby Gender Mentor named a &amp;amp;quot;best product of the year&amp;amp;quot; by DataMonitor, obviously a very on-the-ball company</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/09/29/NPR-Baby-Gender-Mentor.aspx#5363</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:38:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:5363</guid><dc:creator>Gender Selection News</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;No, you're not accidently reading &amp;amp;quot;The Onion&amp;amp;quot; by mistake, this really happened.&lt;br&gt;Baby Gender Mentor...&lt;img src="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5363" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: NPR Radio investigates Baby Gender Mentor accuracy claims</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/09/29/NPR-Baby-Gender-Mentor.aspx#1158</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 23:44:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:1158</guid><dc:creator>Deana</dc:creator><description>I did the gender test at 5 weeks.  I have 2 boys and was hoping for a girl.  The test said that I was having a girl.  However, last week the sonogram showed a VERY male baby.  I had already painted the room pink and given all my boy clothes away.  I am so confused and in a lot of emotional turmoil.  I am mourning the daughter that I thought I had.  While I am happy that he is healthy, it was a complete shock.  They are so convincing with their 99.9% accuracy claim and their 200% garantee.  After reading these posts, I am confident I can paint the room blue.  These people are scam artists.  By the time I give birth and can prove them wrong, they will be out of business and I will be out of luck on my refund.  Thanks, Deana&lt;img src="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1158" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>