<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Doctors are skeptical about Baby Gender Mentor, says Newsweek</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/10/18/Baby-Gender-mentor-Newsweek.aspx</link><description>Doctors are skeptical about the claims of Baby Gender Mentor to predict a baby's gender just 5 weeks into pregnancy with 99.9% accuracy, because no evidence has been presented by the company to back up the claim. When asked about the details of the 14</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Debug Build: 20917.1142)</generator><item><title>Baby Gender Mentor named a &amp;amp;quot;best product of the year&amp;amp;quot; by DataMonitor, obviously a very on-the-ball company</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/10/18/Baby-Gender-mentor-Newsweek.aspx#6649</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 04:29:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:6649</guid><dc:creator>Gender Selection News</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;No, you're not accidently reading &amp;amp;quot;The Onion&amp;amp;quot; by mistake, this really happened.&lt;br&gt;Baby Gender Mentor...&lt;img src="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6649" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Baby Gender Mentor named a &amp;amp;quot;best product of the year&amp;amp;quot; by DataMonitor, obviously a very on-the-ball company</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/10/18/Baby-Gender-mentor-Newsweek.aspx#5365</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:38:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:5365</guid><dc:creator>Gender Selection News</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;No, you're not accidently reading &amp;amp;quot;The Onion&amp;amp;quot; by mistake, this really happened.&lt;br&gt;Baby Gender Mentor...&lt;img src="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5365" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Doctors are skeptical about Baby Gender Mentor, says Newsweek</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/10/18/Baby-Gender-mentor-Newsweek.aspx#3893</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:55:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:3893</guid><dc:creator>michelle</dc:creator><description>I also did the gender mentor test when I was about 12 weeks and it said definetly boy, guess what? I am having a girl according to two ultrasounds. Total rip off!! I think they just guess and don't even test. Who would know?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Michelle&lt;img src="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3893" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Doctors are skeptical about Baby Gender Mentor, says Newsweek</title><link>http://www.in-gender.com/cs/blogs/gender_selection_news/archive/2005/10/18/Baby-Gender-mentor-Newsweek.aspx#2825</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:23:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">98f8303f-e5ee-4260-b4ef-b1490162acf4:2825</guid><dc:creator>wendy Gillispie</dc:creator><description>I did the baby Gendor Mentor test, and it said i was having a boy. Guess what--I am having a girl with a 19 week sonogram, which i am sure is accurate. I also had many sonograms with this pregnancy, as early as 1 week gestation and i dont think we missed a twin. &lt;img src="http://www.in-gender.com/cs/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2825" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>